Analysis of surviving uranium cubes clarifies failure of Nazi nuclear reactor program
A new historical and technical analysis of surviving German nuclear cubes reveals that Werner Heisenberg undercounted the raw materials required to achieve criticality.
FTMQ Science, written by our newsroom0 views

Researchers analyzed two surviving uranium cubes from the World War II German nuclear initiative to determine why researchers failed to achieve nuclear criticality. Ars Technica reported that Timothy Koeth, Miriam Hiebert, and their co-authors re-examined historical records, technical reports, and physical artifacts to evaluate the experimental efforts of the German research teams. [1][2]
The research builds on earlier findings involving a box of declassified documents located in the National Archives. According to Ars Technica, these documents revealed that a separate research group in Gottow possessed roughly 400 additional uranium cubes. If the Gottow inventory had been combined with the material used in the Berlin B-8 reactor experiment, the German scientists would have possessed sufficient material to reach criticality. [1][2]
The Nazi nuclear program, known as the Uranverein or Uranprojekt, began in April 1939 following the discovery of nuclear fission in Berlin. A second research push was reorganized under the Heereswaffenamt on September 1, 1939. Ars Technica reported that the latest paper reaches a new conclusion regarding the failure, indicating that Werner Heisenberg significantly underestimated the amount of uranium required for a working reactor. [1][2][3]
The findings show how secretiveness and lack of cooperation hindered scientific progress. Ars Technica reported that the isolated, secretive approach of the competing German groups prevented them from sharing resources, which ultimately stalled their development of a functional nuclear reactor. [1][2]
In short
- Researchers analyzed two surviving uranium cubes to study the German nuclear program.
- A separate research group at Gottow held approximately 400 uranium cubes that were not shared.
- Werner Heisenberg significantly underestimated the material required to achieve criticality.
- The German nuclear research effort began in April 1939 following the discovery of nuclear fission.
Sources
Every paragraph above points to the numbered items it rests on. Read the originals here.
- [1]Uranium cubes reveal why the German nuclear project failedArs Technica Science, 5h ago (the report this story comes from)
- [2]Uranium cubes reveal why the German nuclear project failedArs Technica, 5h ago
Background
- [3]German nuclear program during World War II on Wikipedia
- [4]Uranium on Grokipedia
Our newsroom writes these reports with the help of software, from the 4 sources listed and nothing else, and checks them against those sources. Facts can still be wrong or move on; the originals are the record. Spotted a mistake? Write to daniel@monsterkong.com.
Related from FTMQ Science
Earlier reports of ours on the same people and subjects.
- German physicists boost diamond sensor sensitivity using laser cavitiesPhysics, 2d ago
- Ancient Chinese solar eclipse record reveals historical changes in Earth rotationNew Research, 9d ago
- Princeton lab identifies potential shortcut to achieve nuclear fusion ignitionNew Research, 25d ago
- Researchers redate the earliest known train delay caused by a solar stormEarth Science, 14d ago
More in New Research
- Online sports betting reduces household savings and investments research finds2h ago
- Mice study shows fear blurs brain memories of safe environments1d ago
- Late sowing of cereal rye significantly reduces ground cover and biomass2d ago
- UCLA study links agricultural pesticide exposure to elevated Parkinson's disease risk3d ago
- Solar wind selectively destroys specific organic compounds on asteroid surfaces3d ago
- Study shows threshold power fails to predict endurance in professional cyclists3d ago
Get the day in one email
Reports like this one, the top news of the last 24 hours, every morning. Free, one email a day; readers can comment under every report.
By signing up you agree to our terms and privacy policy. Unsubscribe any time.

Comments
Loading
Join the conversation
Comments are open to readers of our daily email: the top news of the last 24 hours, every morning, free. Sign up and the comment box opens.
Already on the list? Enter the same address and we will send a sign-in link.
By signing up you agree to our terms and privacy policy. Unsubscribe any time.